Know who you are dealing with before you sign, invest, lend or onboard.
We prepare source-linked public-record risk reports on Indian companies, vendors and promoters — covering identity, filings, litigation, regulatory references, insolvency indicators and director linkages.
Most business relationships start on trust, not records.
Many businesses rely on introductions, polished websites, a GST number and a few basic documents — without ever checking the public-record risk indicators that already exist. By the time a dispute, default or compliance gap surfaces, the contract is signed, the cheque is cleared and the vendor is onboarded.
An introduction
“Someone we know vouched for them.”
A GST number
“They gave us a GSTIN, so they're real.”
A website
“The website looks professional enough.”
A few documents
“They shared a couple of papers.”
What a report can cover
We compile risk indicators from official and credible public sources, match them to the entity and its people, and cite where each finding came from.
MCA / ROC records
Company and LLP master data, status, charges and filing indicators.
GST status & filing indicators
Registration status and public filing-activity signals where available.
EPFO & ESIC checks
Establishment registration indicators for employee-benefit compliance.
District & High Court searches
Public case searches matched to the entity or named individuals.
Consumer court disputes
Consumer forum matters surfaced from public cause lists and orders.
ITAT & tax litigation
Income-tax tribunal and tax-dispute records in the public domain.
IBC / insolvency records
Insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings referenced in public sources.
SEBI & regulatory orders
Publicly available regulatory orders and enforcement references.
Watchout Investors references
References surfaced from publicly maintained investor-caution sources.
Government debarment lists
Public debarment and blacklisting references where published.
Director & promoter linkages
Other entities linked to the same directors or promoters in records.
Adverse public records
Other adverse references located in official or credible public sources.
The indicators we surface
Explore the categories of risk a report can highlight. Each is built from available public records and reported with its source and date of search.
Compliance gaps
Indicators that statutory filings or registrations may be lapsed, inconsistent or missing in public records.
- ROC filing-status indicators
- GST registration status signals
- EPFO / ESIC establishment indicators
- Inactive or struck-off status references
Built for everyone who has to trust a counterparty
Founders & SMEs
Check partners, vendors and counterparties before committing to a deal or relationship.
Investors & acquirers
Screen companies, promoters and litigation history before investing or acquiring.
Procurement teams
Vet vendors before onboarding, issuing POs or extending business credit.
Lenders & fintechs
Add a public-records risk layer before extending business credit or facilities.
Exporters & distributors
Understand overseas-facing counterparties and channel partners before engaging.
CAs, CSs, lawyers & consultants
Support client advisory with structured, source-backed public-records findings.
When a report pays for itself
A single source-backed read before a decision is far cheaper than the dispute, default or write-off it helps you avoid.
Vendor onboarding
Run a check before adding a new supplier or service provider to your books.
Pre-contract checks
Know the counterparty before signing an agreement or master services contract.
Investment screening
Surface red-flag indicators before a term sheet, cheque or follow-on round.
Business credit checks
Layer public-record risk indicators into a credit or limit decision.
Franchise / dealership checks
Assess a franchisor, franchisee or dealership before committing capital.
Acquisition & partnership
Diligence a target or partner across litigation, compliance and linkages.
Monthly monitoring
Keep selected entities on a watchlist and get notified when records change.
A clear report you can act on
Every engagement ends in a structured PDF that any decision-maker can read in minutes — with the sources behind each finding and the date they were checked.
Why teams trust the findings
Every report is built the same disciplined way — anchored to verifiable identifiers, drawn from public sources, and reported with the source and date behind each finding.
How we match identity
We anchor every search to verifiable identifiers — CIN, LLPIN, GSTIN, director DINs and registered names — so findings are tied to the right entity, not a similarly named one.
Sources we typically check
MCA / ROC, GST status, EPFO / ESIC, district and High Court records, consumer forums, ITAT, IBC references, SEBI and regulatory orders, debarment lists and other credible public sources.
How we report findings
Each finding carries its source link and the date of search. We report what the records show in neutral language — no editorialising, no claims beyond the record.
What we don't do
We don't give legal advice, issue credit ratings, run private investigations or guarantee future conduct. A report is a public-records risk picture to inform your own decision.
What a check can surface
Illustrative examplesActive GST, but director-linked litigation surfaced
A supplier looked clean on the surface — valid GSTIN and active status — but a search surfaced pending litigation tied to a common director across two linked entities.
Promoter linked to a struck-off company
Identity matched cleanly, yet linkage mapping showed the promoter tied to a separate company that had been struck off, prompting a closer look before the round.
One address, several entities
A counterparty's registration matched, but the registered address mapped to multiple entities with overlapping directors — a pattern worth understanding before signing.
Examples are illustrative and anonymised — not specific clients or entities.
Choose the depth of check based on the decision
A quick vendor status check may only need identity, MCA and GST indicators. An investment or lending decision may need litigation, regulatory, insolvency and promoter-linkage review. Pricing depends on scope, number of entities and turnaround.
Basic Check
A fast identity and status read on a single entity.
- Identity & registration match
- MCA / ROC status indicators
- GST status signal
- Source links + date of search
Standard Report
A rounded public-records risk picture for most decisions.
- Everything in Basic Check
- Litigation search (district & High Court)
- Compliance risk indicators
- Overall risk summary
Enhanced Report
Deeper diligence across linkages and regulatory records.
- Everything in Standard Report
- Director & promoter linkage mapping
- Regulatory & insolvency references
- Adverse public-record review
Monitoring
Ongoing watchlist coverage on selected entities.
- Monthly re-checks on a watchlist
- Change alerts on key records
- Periodic summary reports
- Scope set per engagement
Pricing depends on scope, number of entities and turnaround time.
Questions, answered
The things buyers usually want to know before they request a report.
A structured PDF covering identity match, the public-record indicators relevant to your scope (MCA/GST, litigation, regulatory, insolvency, director linkages and adverse records), an overall risk summary, and source links with the date of search.
Important — what this report is and is not
This report is based on public records, information provided by the client and records available from official or credible sources as of the date of search. It is not a credit rating, legal opinion, private investigation, certificate of good standing or guarantee of future conduct.
Share the entity. We'll suggest the right scope.
Not sure which check you need? Tell us the entity and the decision you're making over a 15-minute call, or message us on WhatsApp. We'll confirm scope, turnaround and a quote — no obligation.
- Source-backed findings with links
- Clear date of search on every report
- Scope tailored to your decision